1. It detracts from the real, important news stories of the day.

2. It’s lazy. It took me about four minutes to write this post.

3. It rarely allows for much context or nuance. But people like lists!

4. It may be easy to read, and even mildly amusing, but see points 1. through 3.

5. You, and most other people, already knew 4 or 5 of these things.

6. When it’s a “news” piece, it’s bad journalism, partly because of all of the above.

7. Clickbait is the worst.

8. The author can run out of steam, and it becomes obvious this should’ve been a Top 5 list instead.

9. Random tangents frequently pop up, like, have you seen the latest Avengers: Age of Ultron trailer?

10. You finish reading them only to realize they were basically a waste of your time. But you’ll still click on the next listicle, because you never learn.

Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the Policy Options discussion, and send in your own submission. Here is a link on how to do it.

Emmett Macfarlane photo

Emmett Macfarlane

Emmett Macfarlane is an associate professor of political science at the University of Waterloo. His research focuses on the intersection of governance, rights and public policy, with a particular emphasis on the policy impact of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Supreme Court of Canada.

Emmett Macfarlane photo

Emmett Macfarlane

Emmett Macfarlane is an associate professor of political science at the University of Waterloo. His research focuses on the intersection of governance, rights and public policy, with a particular emphasis on the policy impact of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Supreme Court of Canada.

Related Stories

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.