A couple of years ago, as the Internet Goliath continued to drain news consumers away from newspapers and television, old media’s desperation to find a way to fight back led a few bosses to experiment with allowing readers to pick what news stories should be covered. It seemed like a cool way for the old guard to show some digital chops: upend the “legacy” way of doing things — otherwise known as using editorial judgment — by letting the public essentially “vote” on what’s news. Many journalists hated it.

The model has yet to take over news coverage. While crowd-sourcing has shown excellent promise in raising money for a charity or to finance a movie or business, news editors have so far resisted outsourcing their daily decisions to their readers. But digital evangelism knows no bounds, and the desire to use the tools everywhere is moving into the policy process. At first, politicians were predictably interested only in how crowd-sourcing could help them raise money. But now there are signs that they’re willing to show their digital cool by asking the public to submit policy ideas.

In September, the Ontario Liberal Party launched Common Ground, a Web platform that allows anyone — Liberal or otherwise — to help the party craft its next campaign platform. Like a Reddit page, the most popular ideas rise to the top of the page, leading critics to sneer that a policy-by-popularity process is a gimmick. But by late October 1,400 ideas had been submitted. Some reflected special interests (the number two idea called for an end to the province’s ban on breeding certain dogs). Others highlighted a public interest in issues that aren’t always on the radar. There was a push for higher speed limits on highways, to ban gay conversion therapy for minors, and to legalize — and tax — marijuana use (could there be a more defining Liberal policy than legalizing a social behaviour and taxing it at the same time?).

This still doesn’t look like the full fix for modern politics. As Benjamin Barber points out in his book If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities, we are simply applying technology to age-old democratic participation. Technology can help the process. But, as with deciding what’s news, the answer depends on intelligence and good judgment. The solution to better government policy won’t be found in a better app, but in people taking their civic responsibilities seriously.

Photo: Shutterstock by r.classen

Bruce Wallace
Bruce Wallace was appointed editor of Policy Options magazine, the IRPP's flagship publication, in August 2012. A native of Montreal, he was Tokyo bureau chief for the Los Angeles Times from 2004 to 2008, after which he became that newspaper's foreign editor. Over a long career in journalism he has reported from across Canada and around the world, covering wars, elections, economics and three Olympic Games. He has worked outside Canada for 16 of the last 19 years, so he has a good understanding of the global economic, political and security currents that affect Canadian public policy.

You are welcome to republish this Policy Options article online or in print periodicals, under a Creative Commons/No Derivatives licence.

Creative Commons License