Even the name — “press gallery” — is an anachronism. It’s been over half a century since print reporters gave up their dominance as a source of news, first to television and then to the Web. But even in its broadest sense, including all reporters from media organizations who cover developments on Parliament Hill, Ottawa’s Parliamentary Press Gallery has a slightly past-the-sell-by-date feel to it. The “regional” newspapers have stopped sending correspondents to cover politics, the chains have reduced their coverage, and even the TV networks are making cuts. To top it off, the members of the Press Gallery can’t get the Prime Minister to pay attention to them.

So the public forum convened by the Canadian Journalism Foundation (CJF) in Ottawa on April 9 should have been a moment for sober thinking. “Does the Press Gallery matter?” was the good question posed by the CJF to a panel consisting of three gallery members and Cabinet Minster Jason Kenney. Sadly, however, the session turned into just another long-winded complaint about the media’s lack of access to the Harper government.

Their frustration, by now a reflex reaction, is understandable. But the threat to the gallery is bigger than Harper’s stiff-arm. Whether open access to politicians gave us better journalism or just better spin is debatable, and Kenney spent the night easily swatting away familiar anecdotes about his government’s tight lips.

But it was Kenney who pointed out that the bigger question is not the fate of the Press Gallery as an institution, but the future of political journalism. The digital atomization of media is upending the old models: in amount of political coverage, a Web-based news organization like Politico can now exponentially outdo the Washington Post with just a fraction of the revenues. Who will pay for reporting if failing news organizations cannot? Does the future belong to individual journalists operating as their own brands? Will digital media, often openly partisan or favouring advocacy, suck us into silos of political tribes? And what do these upheavals mean for democracy?

The Functionary

Our newsletter about the public service.
Nominated for a Digital Publishing Award. 

The Press Gallery’s woes are the casualty of bigger forces. The Harper government is exploiting the atomization of the media to push its own message. If Harper thought the Press Gallery really mattered, he would talk to it. The real question for the Press Gallery is whether it has a role in this new media landscape. We’re just now seeing the beginning of the changes.

Photo: Shutterstock

Bruce Wallace
Bruce Wallace was appointed editor of Policy Options magazine, the IRPP's flagship publication, in August 2012. A native of Montreal, he was Tokyo bureau chief for the Los Angeles Times from 2004 to 2008, after which he became that newspaper's foreign editor. Over a long career in journalism he has reported from across Canada and around the world, covering wars, elections, economics and three Olympic Games. He has worked outside Canada for 16 of the last 19 years, so he has a good understanding of the global economic, political and security currents that affect Canadian public policy.

You are welcome to republish this Policy Options article online or in print periodicals, under a Creative Commons/No Derivatives licence.

Creative Commons License