Proponents of automation say the developments will create a more efficient and advanced society, but there are concerns that the changes will not affect all citizens equally.

According to Virginia Eubanks, the automation of social and welfare services in the United States is creating a¬†“digital poorhouse,‚ÄĚ deepening class divides and diverting poor and working-class people from accessing public resources.

Eubanks joined the podcast to discuss her new book Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. She is an associate professor of political science at the University at Albany, SUNY.
Download for free. New episodes every second Tuesday. Tweet your questions and comments to @IRPP.

This podcast is part of the special feature Ethical and Social Dimensions of AI.

The inner workings of government
Keep track of who’s doing what to get federal policy made. In The Functionary.
The Functionary
Our newsletter about the public service. Nominated for a Digital Publishing Award.

Photo: Members of the National Welfare Rights Organization marching to end hunger in Washington, DC in 1968. Photo from the Jack Rottier Collection.


Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the Policy Options discussion, and send in your own submission. Here is a link on how to do it. | Souhaitez-vous réagir à cet article ? Joignez-vous aux débats d’Options politiques et soumettez-nous votre texte en suivant ces directives.

You are welcome to republish this Policy Options article online or in print periodicals, under a Creative Commons/No Derivatives licence.

Creative Commons License