{"id":265891,"date":"2018-01-29T11:30:01","date_gmt":"2018-01-29T16:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/issues\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/"},"modified":"2025-10-07T21:57:20","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T01:57:20","slug":"hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error","status":"publish","type":"issues","link":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/","title":{"rendered":"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dropcap-big\">When complex and controversial draft legislation is processed rapidly, significant potential implications of the bill \u2013 and any amendments made to it \u2013 can be missed. Unfortunately, this is precisely what happened with the federal government\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.parl.ca\/DocumentViewer\/en\/42-1\/bill\/C-14\/first-reading\">Bill C-14<\/a> to establish the federal rules regarding medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada. The<a href=\"https:\/\/www.parl.ca\/LegisInfo\/BillDetails.aspx?Language=E&amp;billId=8177165\"> legislation<\/a> was introduced on April 14, 2016 and came into force on June 17, 2016.<\/p>\n<p>Many, many amendments were considered and, unsurprisingly, most of the attention was focused on the most obviously controversial amendments \u2014 particularly on the unsuccessful attempts to allow access to MAID beyond only those individuals whose \u201cnatural death has become reasonably foreseeable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, another amendment received very little attention before being passed \u2014 a mere 10 minutes out of many hours of debate. Yet this amendment created the potential for extended intolerable suffering.<\/p>\n<p>Pre-amendment, the draft legislation set out that<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>241.2(3)\u2002<\/strong>Before a medical practitioner or nurse practitioner provides a person with medical assistance in dying, the medical practitioner or nurse practitioner must\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(b)\u2002<\/strong>ensure that the person\u2019s request for medical assistance in dying was\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(ii)\u2002<\/strong>signed and dated after the person was informed by a medical practitioner or nurse practitioner <strong>that the person\u2019s natural death has become reasonably foreseeable<\/strong>, taking into account all of their medical circumstances;<\/p>\n<p>The final version of the legislation, though, sets out that<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>241.2(3)\u2002<\/strong>Before a medical practitioner or nurse practitioner provides a person with medical assistance in dying, the medical practitioner or nurse practitioner must\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(b)\u2002<\/strong>ensure that the person\u2019s request for medical assistance in dying was\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(ii)\u2002<\/strong>signed and dated after the person was informed by a medical practitioner or nurse practitioner <strong>that the person has a grievous and irremediable medical condition<\/strong>;<\/p>\n<p>A grievous and irremediable medical condition is defined in the legislation as<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>241.2(2)\u2002<\/strong>A person has a grievous and irremediable medical condition only if they meet all of the following criteria:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(a)\u2002<\/strong>they have a serious and incurable illness, disease or disability;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(b)\u2002<\/strong>they are in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(c)\u2002<\/strong>that illness, disease or disability or that state of decline causes them enduring physical or psychological suffering that is intolerable to them and that cannot be relieved under conditions that they consider acceptable; and<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(d)\u2002<\/strong>their natural death has become reasonably foreseeable, taking into account all of their medical circumstances, without a prognosis necessarily having been made as to the specific length of time that they have remaining.<\/p>\n<p>The draft legislation established that a person could make a request for MAiD after having been informed that their <strong>natural death had become reasonably foreseeable<\/strong>. That is a single criterion.<\/p>\n<p>The final version of the legislation, however, establishes that a person cannot make a request for MAiD until they have been informed that they <strong>have a grievous and irremediable medical condition<\/strong>, and meet all <strong>four<\/strong> elements of \u201cgrievous and irremediable medical condition\u201d have been met \u2014 including that the person is <strong>experiencing enduring and intolerable suffering<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Why does this amendment matter? It matters because, under the legislation, there is a mandatory waiting period between the day on which the request is signed and the day on which MAID can be provided as:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>241.2(3)\u2002<\/strong>Before a medical practitioner or nurse practitioner provides a person with medical assistance in dying, the medical practitioner or nurse practitioner must<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>(g)\u2002<\/strong>ensure that there are at least\u00a010\u00a0clear days between the day on which the request was signed by or on behalf of the person and the day on which the medical assistance in dying is provided or\u2009\u2014\u2009if they and the other medical practitioner or nurse practitioner referred to in paragraph (e) are both of the opinion that the person\u2019s death, or the loss of their capacity to provide informed consent, is imminent\u2009\u2014\u2009any shorter period that the first medical practitioner or nurse practitioner considers appropriate in the circumstances;<\/p>\n<p>This means that a person must first reach the point of <strong>enduring and intolerable suffering<\/strong> and <strong>only then<\/strong> can they make the request for MAiD\u2014and <strong>only then<\/strong> can the 10-day clock start.<\/p>\n<p>Under the draft legislation, the person could not make a request (and start their 10-day clock) until after they had been informed that their natural death had become reasonably foreseeable. However, the clock could start before their suffering had become intolerable. While they could not receive MAiD until their suffering had become intolerable, they were not condemned to wait a minimum of 10 days after the onset of intolerable suffering before MAiD could be provided.<\/p>\n<p>Why was this amendment made? At the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ourcommons.ca\/DocumentViewer\/en\/42-1\/JUST\/meeting-16\/evidence\">May 10, 2016 meeting of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights<\/a>, Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois MP Louis Plamondon introduced the amendment (on behalf of Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois MP Luc Th\u00e9riault with the following explanation:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>I\u2019ll introduce the amendment very quickly. I think everyone\u2019s read it and discussed it given that you\u2019re preparing to substitute it for amendment PV-5. After reading the Barreau du Qu\u00e9bec\u2019s submission, we decided to propose this amendment. Given that the <\/em>Carter <em>decision would inevitably give rise to legal challenges, I believe our amendment is entirely appropriate. Thank you, Mr. Chair.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>There are two problems with the explanation Plamondon gave to the committee.<\/p>\n<p>First, the Barreau du Qu\u00e9bec\u2019s submission did not advocate for this amendment. Rather, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ourcommons.ca\/DocumentViewer\/en\/42-1\/JUST\/meeting-10\/minutes\">Barreau called for<\/a> the removal of the narrow, four-part definition of \u201cgrievous and irremediable medical condition.\u201d It argued that s. 241.2(2) is inconsistent with the <a href=\"https:\/\/scc-csc.lexum.com\/scc-csc\/scc-csc\/en\/item\/14637\/index.do\"><em>Carter<\/em><\/a> decision, which struck down the <em>Criminal Code<\/em> prohibitions on MAID, and with the <em>Charter of Rights and Freedoms,<\/em> and should be removed.<\/p>\n<p>Had this happened, there would have been no problem with the amendment at issue here. A person would still not have been able to sign their request for MAID until they had been informed that they had a grievous and irremediable medical condition; however, that would not have required that their suffering already be intolerable and would not have extended this suffering by a minimum of 10 days.<\/p>\n<p>Second, there is no indication that this amendment\u2019s practical consequence (imposing a minimum additional 10 days of intolerable suffering) was contemplated by the members of the committee voting on the amendment. One can hope that they would not have adopted the amendment had they been alerted to this consequence.<\/p>\n<p>Now that the consequence has been identified, the legislation should be amended. Otherwise, what was a presumably inadvertent imposition of 10 additional days of intolerable suffering will become undeniably intentional. And that would be remediable cruelty.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"image-caption\">Photo: Shutterstock, by Joyce Nelson<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the\u00a0<\/em>Policy Options<em>\u00a0discussion, and send in your own submission.\u00a0Here is a\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/article-submission\/\"><em>link<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0on how to do it. <\/em><em>|\u00a0Souhaitez-vous r\u00e9agir \u00e0 cet article ? <\/em><em>Joignez-vous aux d\u00e9bats d\u2019<\/em>Options politiques\u00a0<em>et soumettez-nous votre texte en suivant ces\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/article-submission\/\"><em>directives<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When complex and controversial draft legislation is processed rapidly, significant potential implications of the bill \u2013 and any amendments made to it \u2013 can be missed. Unfortunately, this is precisely what happened with the federal government\u2019s Bill C-14 to establish the federal rules regarding medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada. The legislation was introduced [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":256148,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","ep_exclude_from_search":false,"apple_news_api_created_at":"2025-10-08T01:57:23Z","apple_news_api_id":"d9e7cb16-11f7-4605-afd9-a82ad1e2ae5a","apple_news_api_modified_at":"2025-10-08T01:57:23Z","apple_news_api_revision":"AAAAAAAAAAD\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/w==","apple_news_api_share_url":"https:\/\/apple.news\/A2efLFhH3RgWv2agq0eKuWg","apple_news_cover_media_provider":"image","apple_news_coverimage":0,"apple_news_coverimage_caption":"","apple_news_cover_video_id":0,"apple_news_cover_video_url":"","apple_news_cover_embedwebvideo_url":"","apple_news_is_hidden":"","apple_news_is_paid":"","apple_news_is_preview":"","apple_news_is_sponsored":"","apple_news_maturity_rating":"","apple_news_metadata":"\"\"","apple_news_pullquote":"","apple_news_pullquote_position":"","apple_news_slug":"","apple_news_sections":[],"apple_news_suppress_video_url":false,"apple_news_use_image_component":false},"categories":[9359,9372,9377],"tags":[8450],"article-status":[],"irpp-category":[4339,4251,4286],"section":[],"irpp-tag":[7082],"class_list":["post-265891","issues","type-issues","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-loi-droits","category-recent-stories-fr","category-sante","tag-assisted-dying-fr","irpp-category-loi-et-justice","irpp-category-politique-sociale","irpp-category-sante","irpp-tag-aide-medicale-a-mourir"],"acf":[],"apple_news_notices":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When complex and controversial draft legislation is processed rapidly, significant potential implications of the bill \u2013 and any amendments made to it \u2013 can be missed. Unfortunately, this is precisely what happened with the federal government\u2019s Bill C-14 to establish the federal rules regarding medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada. The legislation was introduced [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Policy Options\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/IRPP.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-08T01:57:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@irpp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/\",\"name\":\"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-29T16:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-08T01:57:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":700},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"Policy Options\",\"description\":\"Institute for Research on Public Policy\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error","og_description":"When complex and controversial draft legislation is processed rapidly, significant potential implications of the bill \u2013 and any amendments made to it \u2013 can be missed. Unfortunately, this is precisely what happened with the federal government\u2019s Bill C-14 to establish the federal rules regarding medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada. The legislation was introduced [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/","og_site_name":"Policy Options","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/IRPP.org","article_modified_time":"2025-10-08T01:57:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":700,"url":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@irpp","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/","url":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/","name":"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg","datePublished":"2018-01-29T16:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-08T01:57:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/downie.jpg","width":2000,"height":700},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/2018\/01\/hasty-change-to-assisted-dying-bill-a-serious-error\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hasty change to assisted dying bill a serious error"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/","name":"Policy Options","description":"Institute for Research on Public Policy","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues\/265891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/issues"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/256148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265891"},{"taxonomy":"article-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article-status?post=265891"},{"taxonomy":"irpp-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/irpp-category?post=265891"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=265891"},{"taxonomy":"irpp-tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/policyoptions.irpp.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/irpp-tag?post=265891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}