1/One of the most interesting topics in modern times is the ”œrobots eat all the jobs” thesis; best book on topic: [The Second Machine Age by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee.]

2/The thesis is that computers can more and more substitute for human labor, thus displacing jobs and creating unemployment.

3/At core, this is Luddism ”””Š ”œlump of labor” fallacy, that there is a fixed amount of work to be done.

4/The counterargument is Milton Friedman: Human wants and needs are infinite; there is always more to do. 200 years of history confirms.

5/To avoid the Luddite mistake, must believe ”œthis time is different,” that either (a) there won’t be new wants and needs (vs human nature),

6/Or (b) It won’t matter that there are new wants and needs, most people won’t be able to adapt to contribute & have jobs in new fields.

7/While it is certainly true that technological change displaces current work & jobs, and that is a serious issue that must be addressed…

8/It is equally true, and important, that the other result of each such change is a step function increase in consumer standards of living.

9/As consumers, we virtually never resist technology change that provides us with better products/services even when it costs jobs…

10/Nor should we. This is how we build a better world, improve quality of life, better provide for our kids, solve fundamental problems.

11/Make no mistake, advocating slowing tech change to preserve jobs = advocating punishing consumers, stalling quality of life improvements.

12/So how then to best help individuals who are buffeted by producer-side technology change and lose jobs they wish they could keep?

13/First, focus on increasing access to education and skill development”Š ”””Š which itself will increasingly be delivered via technology.

14/Second, let markets work (voluntary contracts and trade) so that capital and labor can rapidly reallocate to create new fields and jobs.

15/Third, a vigorous social safety net so that people are not stranded and unable to provide for their families.

16/The loop closes as rapid technological productivity improvement and resulting economic growth make it easy to pay for safety net.

Marc Andreessen @pmarca
1/The flip side of ”œrobots eat all the jobs” not being discussed: The current revolution in the ”œmeans of production” going to everyone.

2/In the form of the smartphone (and tablet and PC) + mobile broadband +”ˆthe Internet: Will be in almost everyone’s hands by 2020.

3/Then everyone gets access to unlimited information, communication, education, access to markets, participate in global market economy.

4/This is not a world we have ever lived in: Historically most people in most places cut off from these things, usually to a high degree.

5/It is hard to believe that the result will not be a widespread global unleashing of creativity, productivity, and human potential.

6/It is hard to believe that people will get these capabilities and then come up with…absolutely nothing useful to do with them.

7/And yet that is the subtext to the ”œthis time is different” argument that there won’t be new ideas, fields, industries, businesses, jobs.

8/In arguing this with an economist friend, response was ”œBut most people are like horses; they have only their manual labor to offer.”

9/I don’t believe that, and I don’t want to live in a world in which that’s the case. I think people everywhere have far more potential.

Marc Andreessen @pmarca
1/Thought experiment: Posit a world in which all material needs are provided free, by robots and material synthesizers.

2/Housing, energy, health care, food, transportation         All delivered to everyone for $0, by machines. Zero jobs in those fields remaining.

3/What would be the key characteristics of that world, and what would it be like to live in it?

4/First, it’s a consumer utopia: Everyone enjoys a standard of living that kings and Popes could have only dreamed.

5/Fifth [sic], all human time, labor, energy, ambition, and goals reorient to the intangibles: the big questions, the deep needs.

6/Human nature expresses itself fully, for the first time in history. Without physical need constraints, we will be whoever we want to be.

7/The main fields of human endeavor will be culture, arts, sciences, creativity, philosophy, experimentation, exploration, adventure.

8/Rather than nothing to do, we would have everything to do: curiosity, artistic and scientific creativity, new forms of status seeking (!).

9/Imagine six, or 10, billion people doing nothing but arts and sciences, culture and exploring and learning. What a world that would be.

10/The problem seems unlikely to be that we get there too fast. The problem seems like [sic] to be that we’ll get there too slow.

11/Utopian fantasy you say? OK, so then what’s your preferred long-term state? What else should we be shooting for, if not this?

Marc Andreessen is an American entrepreneur, investor and software engineer.

Vous pouvez reproduire cet article d’Options politiques en ligne ou dans un périodique imprimé, sous licence Creative Commons Attribution.

Creative Commons License