Upcoming Senate appointments will provide a test for the common wording in Ministerial mandate letters:
“You are expected to do your part to fulfill our government’s commitment to transparent, merit-based appointments, to help ensure gender parity and that Indigenous Canadians and minority groups are better reflected in positions of leadership.”
The inner workings of governmentKeep track of who’s doing what to get federal policy made. In The Functionary.The FunctionaryOur newsletter about the public service. Nominated for a Digital Publishing Award.
This, along with the push for gender parity and greater diversity in these appointments (see Trudeau urged to create gender-balanced Senate), means the Government and advisory panel will be judged partly by these objectives.
In that context, I thought it might be interesting to compare the Chrétien and Harper records with respect to diversity.
The inner workings of government
Keep track of who’s doing what to get federal policy made. In The Functionary.
The Functionary
Our newsletter about the public service.
Nominated for a Digital Publishing Award.
Chrétien, with his 75 appointments, achieved close to parity for women, with aboriginal peoples slightly over-represented. Visible minorities were under-represented, however.
Harper with his 57 appointments, in contrast, slightly over-represented visible minorities while under-representing women and aboriginal peoples (the fewer number of appointments over a comparable time period reflects his decision to stop appointing senators in response to the Duffy and other scandals).
We will see what PM Trudeau and the advisory body come up with.
